Showing posts with label movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label movies. Show all posts

Two Movies, Two Dilemmas

Thursday, August 7, 2008

Finally, I saw 'The Dark Knight' and 'Jaane Tu Ya Jaane Na'. Both the movies got me thinking on tangents.

Just before the credits roll in JTYJN the camera pans on to an old guy waiting(outside an airport) holding a board with 'Mr.Godot' written on it. Which is interesting because 'Waiting for Godot' is a play by Samuel Beckett. The play has two guys waiting for a Mr.Godot in vain. Does the filmmaker, at the happy end of a romantic film, want to convey that waiting for Love is just useless? Bleak, no? Well, maybe he just wants to convey that a long wait is often necessary.

But since these are not topics I am comfortable with, we move on to TDK:

In the movie, Joker puts bombs on two ferries with the respective remotes on the other ferry. Each ferry could save itself by detonating the bomb on the other ferry. Failing which he would explode both the bombs. In this situation it is quite clear what the players should do. Logically, each ferry had to press the button and destroy the other ferry, before they themselves are blown apart. Incidentally the ferries had humans on them, who typically use emotion to make decisions. They preferred being dead rather than live with blood on their hands. But since this is a Batman movie after all, the dark knight comes, stops the Joker and saves the day. Conversely, since this is not a Bollywood movie, he doesn't get the woman.

Though there is no dilemma here, it is interesting to see how it is not one. Also, it always helps if you know what to say to the cops, when you and your dealer are rounded up.

The classic 'Prisoner's Dilemma' is defined as:

Two suspects are arrested by the police. The police have insufficient evidence for a conviction, and, having separated both prisoners, visit each of them to offer the same deal. If one testifies ("defects") for the prosecution against the other and the other remains silent, the betrayer goes free and the silent accomplice receives the full 10-year sentence. If both remain silent, both prisoners are sentenced to only six months in jail for a minor charge. If each betrays the other, each receives a five-year sentence. Each prisoner must choose to betray the other or to remain silent. Each one is assured that the other would not know about the betrayal before the end of the investigation. How should the prisoners act?

The payoff matrix:






Prisoner B Stays Silent

Prisoner B Betrays

Prisoner A Stays Silent




Each serves 6 months

Prisoner A: 10 years
Prisoner B: goes free







Prisoner A Betrays




Prisoner A: goes free
Prisoner B: 10 years

Each serves 5 years


Which in ‘win-lose’ terminology looks like this:


Cooperate

Defect

Cooperate

win-win

lose much-win much

Defect

win much-lose much

lose-lose

While in the situation at hand, which is not a dilemma, the payoff matrix becomes:


Ferry B does nothing

Ferry B presses the button

Ferry A does nothing

Joker blasts them both high in the air.

A sinks, B whistles a tune on its way to dry land.

Ferry A presses the button

A lives on guiltily, B gets its ass kicked.

Accidentally if such perfect timing is achieved, both sail on to Kingdom Come


And therefore:


Cooperate

Defect

Cooperate

lose-lose

lose-win

Defect

win-lose

lose-lose


Contrary to the classic dilemma, if both the players choose not to hurt the other, they both lose. There is no incentive for co-operation, which is why they should have pressed the buttons, just as soon as they got it. They depended too much on the Batman, which is a foolproof strategy in the movies. The real world consequences are ill researched for now.

Anyway, keep watching movies and getting high. Just don't get busted!


P.S. Check out the external links in the Wiki article for more fascinating reads. Especially, the Bowerbird’s dilemma!


Posted by Unknown at 2:40 PM | 1 comments | email this  

Hips don't lie

Sunday, October 14, 2007

After we covered the assets of Celina Jaitley and Dia Mirza, we did the natural thing.

We wondered, why Rakhi Sawant rolled her 'arse'?

After much investigation, we find it's...

...because her American accent trainer told her to roll her 'R's.

Well, can't blame her for trying to improve! We wish her all the best.

[Written for CircusMouse]


Posted by Unknown at 3:35 PM | 0 comments | email this  

Bhool Bhulaiyaa

Friday, October 5, 2007

Mumbai based advocate S Kunjuraman, seems to have enjoyed his private moments with himself watching the song Hare Rama Hare Krishna from the soon to release(Oct 12) Bhool Bhulaiyaa.

Consumed by guilt, he has taken it upon himself to safeguard the sentiments of Hindus and Buddhists everywhere. Apparently we are all hurt that half-clad girls are shown dancing right in front of a Buddha statue while Hare Rama is played.

“It is objectionable and therefore, the song must be deleted from the film”, he says.

It scares me. I hear in some parts of the world, white is taken to be a very pure colour and anyone degrading it is held in contempt. Considering the colours I use on this blog, I might be hurting them by using black on white. They might even tell me to delete the posts. Maybe I should shift to using green on red. Only if the Greenlanders and the algae in the red sea don’t object, that is.

Such changes would soon have to be done. Meanwhile, since Kunju-Raman[little raman] is such an obvious belittlement of Ramen and hence by extension, an insult to my revered God, Flying Spaghetti Monster, I call for his deletion from this world.


P.S. -
[If you do go read the rediff article you would note that many readers are trying to figure out which movie is a copy of which. Just so you know. Manichitrathazhu(Malayalam) was made in 1993. It was remade in Kannada as Apthamithra(it doesn’t seem to have an IMDb entry), following which Chandramukhi(Tamil) was made in 2005. And now we have Bhool Bhulaiya. Personally I think the original is unmatchable. The voters on IMDb concur with a startling 9.4/10]


Posted by Unknown at 1:33 AM | 0 comments | email this  

Calling all wannabe dads

Thursday, September 13, 2007

(cross posted on circusmouse.blogspot.com)

Celina Jaitley has landed herself a new job. Its has got something to do with those pyramidal mammaries, is what I hear.



Anyway, we all know, from her previous splendid work, about her undying devotion to the roles she takes up. Rumours are that her overwhelming dedication to the new job, makes her want to become a 'Mummy'.

Anyone wanting to help her in this noble endeavour is requested to contact her soon, as the 'Openings' are limited..

Update: She has yet to come up with the right guy. There is still hope. Who could have guessed the drawbacks of winning sex appeal polls..


Posted by Unknown at 3:57 AM | 0 comments | email this